To date, peer-reviewed research has found no evidence linking supervised consumptions sites (SCSs) to increased
crime. Yet, in March 2020, a government Report released in the province of Alberta, Canada, presented the results of
a review that reached a different conclusion. This commentary highlights the Report’s major methodological limitations with respect to its criminological components, including that crime was poorly operationalized and measured, change in crime was inadequately assessed, and the effect of SCSs on crime was not ascertained. It is argued that the
magnitude of methodological flaws in the Report undermines the validity of its criminological claims and raise significant issues with the soundness of its conclusions.